“The focus of this chapter is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for addressing issues of equity of access to information and communication technology (ICT), for students from diverse backgrounds” (p. 31).
People at a disadvantage are those with low incomes, and cultural and linguistic backgrounds that differ from the mainstream in this country. Not mentioned in the text are those with disabilities. Attaining ITC literacy is a challenge for many in this population but is important because becoming ITC literate can make all the difference in ability to function and quality of life.
There are 3 digital divides:
The
first digital divide is related to “access to technology infrastructure (computers, multimedia equipment,
software (here is a great free software program for the
math nerds in the group and
web2.0 tools are available for anyone to use as well), the presence or absence of
Internet connectivity , and recently, the
speed of Internet connections at home or in community settings.
The
second digital divide relates to access to achievement-enhancing technology mediated instruction (TMI) in and out of school. Some of the causes of limited access to TMI are fewer skilled teachers; different technology assignments dependent on student’s skills; fewer skilled
parents who can be relied on as resources or who value technology; poor uses of ITC such as use of the ineffective TMI strategies of drill and practice, defensive teaching, and using access as a reward. Some resources for teachers are
resource-sharing blogs like
freetech4teachers and
4teachers.
The
third digital divide relates to access to
culturally sensitive TMI. To close this divide, teachers who are knowledgeable about multicultural education and can incorporate this into their practice are needed in every school.
Creating equitable classrooms is an important aspect of the third digital-divide. It includes: providing a broad conception of what it means to be smart; allowing multiple ways to demonstrate and evaluate, having students interact with each other in meaningful group activities and being aware of mainstream versus minority cultural views of the world.
Overall, the group agreed that it is an enormous challenge for teachers to provide students with equitable access to technology. A few responses indicated that the concept of a cultural divide was novel due to classrooms being largely ethnically and racially homogeneous. Even though some schools served by students in cohort 4 have little ethnic diversity, there are differences in socio-economic and cognitive skills among the student populations. For students who may be positioned on a different side of the cultural divide from their classmates, teachers must take special care and extra time before, during and after assignments.
Several postings describe their effort to support equity was enhanced by the one-to-one laptop program spearheaded by the
Maine Learning Technology Initiative. Initially this program struggled to meet the student and teacher expectations, but with time, problems continue to be worked out. Improvements such as utilizing
iTunesU as a platform to communicate and teach new technology skills are allowing teacher-trainings across distances. As years go by, students and their families are responding to the accessibility and use of technology, relation to instruction and assessment demands.
Equally important in reducing the factors that contribute to the digital divide, is the value of building and engaging community support by including parents in education and access to technology. Currently, in the state of Maine, adult education programs are stepping up to provide
workshops for parents regarding internet safety and how to maneuver through Power School, as well as the typical computer courses. Providing technology staff sufficient time and funds to maintain technology hardware is a critical aspect of equitable access to technology.
One critical conclusion is that efforts must continue for colleges and universities, as well as in-service programs, to support teachers in order that professional skills and knowledge remain at the cutting edge. The best one-to-one program and the most elaborate resources are rendered useless if teachers are ill-prepared to use such resources effectively. Reducing cultural disadvantages, which prevent children and adults from accessing technology depends largely on teachers whose technological and pedagogical knowledge addresses students’ backgrounds.